DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20194220

Ultrasound guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: suitability and effectiveness with factors affecting its successful outcome

Yassar Shiekh, Aamir Javed Khan, Shafqat Shabir Bhawani

Abstract


Background: Intussusception being the leading cause of acute abdomen in childhood, its timely and accurate diagnosis assumes utmost significance in reducing the morbidity and mortality.  Childhood intussusceptions are still managed surgically in our region; however, non-operative reduction has now become the gold standard of treatment worldwide. In this study, authors desired to evaluate the suitability and effectiveness of hydrostatic reduction of intussusception under ultrasound (USG)-guidance and to scrutinize the factors affecting the successful outcome.

Methods: Ours was a prospective study carried out at a tertiary care centre in central Kashmir. All except those with clinical features of bowel gangrene, intestinal prolapse and peritonitis underwent ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction (USGHR). A maximum of three attempts were allowed.

Results: Mean age of the patients was 11.2±8.8 months with age range of 3-50 months. 69.1% (n=38) of the patients presented within 24 h of being symptomatic while 30.9% had delayed presentation (>24 h). The success rate of USGHR was 81.8% (n=45). Late presentation, age and gender of the patients had no influence on successful outcome of the procedure, p >0.005. The duration of hospital stay between those who had successful hydrostatic reduction and those who afterwards underwent operative reduction or resection achieved statistical significance, p=0.0015.  Authors attained a 66.2 % (45/68) reduction in operative management using USGHR as the main modality of treatment.

Conclusions: USGHR is a simple, safe and effective non-operative method of treating intussusceptions in children in a limited resource setting. 


Keywords


Hydrostatic reduction, Intussusception, Saline, Ultrasound-guided

Full Text:

PDF

References


Beasley SW, Hutson JM, Auldist AW. Essential paediatric surgery. Arnold; 1996.

Hamby LG, Fowler CL, Pokony WJ. Intussusception. In: Donellan WL, editor. Abdominal Surgery of Infancy and Childhood. Luxembourg: Harwood Academic Publishers; 2001. 42/1-42/19.

Columbani PM, Scholz S. Intussusception. In: Coran AG, Adzick NS, Krummel TM, Laberge JM, Shamberger RC, Caldamone AA, editors. Pediatric Surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2012.1093-110.

Ogundoyin OO, Atalabi AM, Lawal TA, Olulana DI. Experience with sonogram – guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in children in south West Nigeria. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2013;3(2):76-88

Talabi AO, Sowande OA, Etonyeaku CA, Adejuyigbe O. Childhood intussusception in Ile – Ife: what has changed? Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2014;10(3):239-42.

Kim YG, Choi BI, Yeon KM, Kim JW. Diagnosis and treatment of childhood intussusception using real time ultra-sonography and saline enema: preliminary report. J Korean Soc Med Ultrasound. 1982;1(1):66-70.

Khong PL, Peh WC, Lam CH, Chan KL, Cheng W, Lam WW, et al. Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of childhood intussusception: technique and demonstration. Radiograph. 2000 Sep;20(5):e1.

Alebossein M, Babaheidarian P, Salamati P. Comparison of different modalities of reducing childhood intussusception. Iran J Radiol. 2011;8(2):83-7.

Mensah Y, Glover-Addy H, Etwire V, Appeadu-Mensah W, Twum M. Ultrasound guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in children at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital: An initial experience. Ghana Med J. 2011;45(3):128-31.

Wakjira E, Sisay S, Zember J, Zewdneh D, Gorfu Y, Kebede T, et al. Implementing ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusceptions in a low-resource country in sub-Saharan Africa: our initial experience in Ethiopia. Emerg Radiol. 2018;25(1):1-6.

Marinkovic S, Bucarica S, Jeckovic M, Skoric S, Antic J, Starcevic Z. Ultrasound- guided water enema for reduction of childhood intussusception. Med Pregl. 2007;60(11-12):605-9.

Cheng KL, Saing H, wc P, Mya GH, Cheng W, Khong PL, et al. Childhood intussusception: ultrasound-guided Hartmann’s solution hydrostatic reduction or barium enema reduction. J Pediatr Surg. 1997;32(1):3-6.

Bekdash B, Marven SS, Spigg A. Reduction of intussusception: defining a better index of successful non-operative treatment. Pediatr Radiol. 2013;43(6):649-56.

Ocal S, Cevik M, Boleken ME, Karakas E. A comparison of manual versus hydrostatic reduction in children with intussusception: single-center experience. Afr J Paeditr Surg. 2014;11(2):184-8.

Ahmad MM, Wani MD, Dar HM, Mir IN, Wani HA, et al. An experience of ultrasound guided reduction of intussusception at a tertiary care Centre. S Afr J Surg. 2016;54(1):10-3.

He N, Zhang S, Ye X, Zhu X, Zhao Z, Sui X. Risk factors associated with failed sonographically guided saline hydrostatic intussusception reduction in children. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33(9):1669-75.

Bode CO. Presentation and management outcome of childhood intussusception in Lagos: a prospective study. Afr J Paed Surg. 2008;5(1):24-8

Digant SM, Rucha S, Eke S. Ultrasound guided reduction of an ileocolic intussusception by a hydrostatic method by using normal saline enema in paediatric patients: a study of 30 cases. J Clin Diagn Research. 2012;6(10):1722.

Nayak D, Jagdish S. Ultrasound guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in children by saline enema. Indian J Surg. 2008;70(1):8-13.

Flaum V, Schneider A, Ferreira CG, Philippe P, Sancho CS, Lacreuse I, et al. Twenty tears experience for reduction of ileocolic intussusceptions by saline enema under ultrasound control. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;51(1):179-82.

Gfoerer S, Fiegel H, Rolle U. Ultrasound-guided reduction of intussusception: a safe and effective method performed by pediatric surgeons. Pediatr Surg Int. 2016;32(7):679-82.

Sanchez TR, Doskocil B, Stein-Wexler R. Nonsurgical management of intussusception: retrospective comparison between sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34(1):59-63.

Ko HS, Schenk JP, Troger J, Rohrschneider WK. Current radiological management of intussusception in children. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(9):2411-21.

Daneman A, Alton DJ, Lobo E, Gravett J, Kim P, Ein SH. Patterns of recurrence of intussusception in children: a 17-year review. Pediatr Radiol. 1998;28(12):913-9.

Ein S. Recurrent intussusception in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1975;10:751-5.

Eshel G, Barr J, Heiman J, Bistritzer T, Broide E, Klin B, et al. Incidence of recurrent intussusception following barium versus air enema. Acta Pediatr. 1997;86(5):545-6.

Khorana J, Singhavejsakul J, Ukarapol N, Laohapensang M, Siriwongmongkol J, Patumanond J. Prognostic indicators for failed nonsurgical reduction of intussusception. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016;12:1231-7.

Eklof OA, Johanson L, Lohr G. Childhood intussusception:hydroststic reducibility and incidence of leading point in different age groups. Pediatr Radiol. 1980;10(2):83-6.

Wong CWY, Chan IHY, Chung PHY, Lan LCL, Lam WWM, Wong KKY, et al. Childhood intussusception: 17-year experience at tertiary referral Centre in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2015;21(6):518-23.

Chung JL, Kong MS, Lin JN, Wang KL, Lou CC, Wong HF. Intussusception in and children: risk factors leading to surgical reduction. J Formos Med Assoc. 1994;93(6):481-5.

van de Ende ED, Allema JH, Hazebroek FWJ, Breslau PJ. Success with hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in relation to duration of symptoms. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90(10):1071-2.

Rohrschneider WK, Troger J. Hydrostatic reduction of intussusception under US guidance. Pediatr Radiol. 1995;25(7):530-4.

Bia YZ, Qu RB, Wang GD, Zhang KR, Li Y, Huang Y, et al. Ultrasound- guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception by saline enema: a review of 5218 cases in 17 years. Am J Surg. 2006;192(3):273-5.