DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20211059

Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anesthesia comparison of efficacy in terms of analgesia and motor and sensory blockade

Akif Mutahar Shah, Aliya Shah, Safura Riaz, Muzzafar Zaman

Abstract


Background: This study was conducted on patients to compare efficacy in terms of motor and sensory blockade and prolonged time of analgesia between spinal and combined spinal epidural methods of anesthesia.

Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 60 adult patients of either sex belonging to ASA grade I and II, from June 2014 to June 2016 at Maharishi Markendeshwar institute of medical sciences and research, Mullana in the department of anesthesia.

Results: The patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 30 each as defined in text, by a computer-generated number. Proper statistical methods were applied and results obtained. results were statistically significant p<0.05.

Conclusions: The Combined spinal epidural technique has been described in the medical literature for use in general surgery, orthopedics, trauma surgery of a lower limb, and urological and gynecological surgery. With this technique, surgical anesthesia is established rapidly, saving 15-20 minutes compared with epidural anesthesia. Patients who received the combined technique had more intense motor blockade than those who received epidural anesthesia alone.


Keywords


Spinal, Epidural, Anesthesia, Motor, Sensory, Analgesia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Felsby S, Juelsgaard P. Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia. Anesthanalg. 1995;80;821-6.

Sharma K, Chari P, Gupta S. Combined spinal anaesthesia for lower limb orthopedic procedures. J anaesth clin pharmacol. 1994;10:257-60.

Vercauteren M. Twenty years of clinical use of combined spinal epidural anaesthesia: the evolution equipment. Clin dialogues regional anaesthesia. 2002:17:1-4.

Eldor J. Combined spinal epidural general anaesthesia. Reg anaesth. 1994;19:365-6.

Gupta P, Dua CK, Verma UC, Saxena KN, Chakraborty I. Sequential combined spinal epidural versus epidural anaesthesia in orthopaedic and gynaecological surgery: a comparative study. Indian j anaesth. 2002;46:453-6.

Talikota N, Muntha B, Thatisetti PV. Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Sequential Combined Spinal Epidural Technique and Spinal Block for Lower Abdominal Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Sci Study. 2015(3):4.

Banerjee SG, Bandyopadhyay U, Pan PK, Sinha A. Study of quality and extent of intrathecal bupivacaine block by extradural injection of bupivacaine or normal saline in combined spinal epidural technique. Anaesthesia essays res. 2014;8(1):54-8.

Bhattacharya D, Tewari I, Chowdhuri S. Comparative study of sequential combined spinal epidural anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia in high-risk geriatric patients for major orthopaedic surgery. Indian j anaesth. 2007:51(1):32-6.

Okasha MM, Kamal S, Ramzy A. Epidural volume extension with saline in combined spinal epidural anaesthesia for dynamic hip sc rew surgeries using low dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine. Ain-Shams j anesthesiol. 2014:07:350-5.

Tummala V, Rao Vallury MK, Sanapala A. Combined spinal epidural anesthesia, high risk geriatric patients of bupivacaine or normal saline in combined spinal epidural technique. Anesthesia. Essays res. 2014:1:54-5.

Gupta S, Naithani U, Sinha N, Doshi V, Karthik S, Bedi V. Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch versus normal saline for epidural volume extension in combined spinal epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. J obstet anaesthesia crit care. 2012:2(1):16-22.