DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20222403
Published: 2022-09-23

A comparative study of sagittal abdominal diameter and other anthropometric indices of obesity in adults with family history of cardiovascular risk factors

Nishmita R., Ravi K.

Abstract


Background: Obesity is evolving into a modern day epidemic in India. Visceral Adipose Tissue is the main culprit, being the metabolically active component that is responsible for the cardiovascular risk factors. The day-to-day anthropometric indices fail to take body composition and distribution into account and hence miss a chance at early detection. Family history plays an important role by serving as a genetic link in the transmission of risk factors. There is a need for vigorous screening techniques which are clinically plausible for an early diagnosis of visceral adiposity in individuals predisposed to the numerous risks caused by its accumulation. Sagittal abdominal diameter is a useful tool in measuring the visceral adipose tissue clinically and in the current study; a comparison was done between SAD and already existing anthropometric indices.

Methods: The study was done on 223 subjects in Bangalore during the period of November 2015 to May 2017.Among the subjects studied, 54.7% were Male and 45.3% were female. When compared to BMI, WC and WHR, SAD correlated better with total cholesterol, fasting blood sugar, post prandial blood sugar and HbA1c.

Results: The mean SAD was more in people with a combined history of DM and HTN than in individuals with history of either DM or HTN alone.

Conclusions: We could conclude that Sagittal Abdominal Diameter is comparable to Body Mass Index, but it correlates better with metabolic risk profile of an individual than BMI, WC and WHR.

 


Keywords


Sagittal abdominal diameter, Visceral adiposity, Family history, Cardiovascular disease

Full Text:

PDF

References


Redefining obesity: the asia-pacific perspective and its treatment. Available at: http://www.wpro.who.int/ nutrition/documents/docs/Redefiningobesity.pdf. Accessed on 20 October 2021.

Global action plan for the prevention and control of NCDs-2013-2020. Available at: http://www.who. int/nmh/events/ncd_action_plan/en/. Accessed on 20 October 2021.

National cardiovascular disease database. Available at: http://www.searo.who.int/india/topics/ cardiovascular_diseases/NCD_Resources_National_CVD_database-Final_Report.pdf?ua=1. Accessed on 20 October 2021.

Obesity and Overweight: Fact sheet. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/. Accessed on 20 October 2021.

Ramachandran A. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in urban Indian adolescent school children. Diab Res Clin Practice .2002;57:185-90.

Valsamakis G, Chetty R, Anwar A, Banerjee A, Barnett A, Kumar S. Association of simple anthropometric measures of obesity with visceral fat and the metabolic syndrome in male Caucasian and Indo-Asian subjects. Diab Medicine. 2004;21(12): 1339-45.

Fox C, Massaro J, Hoffmann U, Pou K, Maurovich-Horvat P, Liu C et al. Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments: association with metabolic risk factors in the framingham heart study. Circulation. 2007;116(1): 39-48.

Yim J, Kim D, Lim S, Park M, Choi S, Lee C, et al. Sagittal Abdominal diameter is a strong anthropometric measure of visceral adipose tissue in the Asian general population. Diab Care. 2010; 33(12):2665-70.

Perusse L, Despres JP, Lemieux S, Rice T, Rao DC, Bouchard C. Familial aggregation of abdominal visceral fat level: results from the Quebec Family Study. Metabolism. 1996;45:378-82.

Vasques A, Cassani R, Forti A, Vilela B, Pareja J, Tambascia M, et al. Sagittal Abdominal diameter as a surrogate marker of insulin resistance in an admixtured population Brazilian metabolic syndrome study (BRAMS). PLOS ONE. 2015;10(5):e0125365

Risérus U, de Faire U, Berglund L, Hellénius M. Sagittal Abdominal Diameter as a Screening Tool in Clinical Research: Cutoffs for Cardiometabolic Risk. J Obesity. 2010;2010:1-7.

Sharda M, Jain P, Gupta A, Nagar D, Soni A. Correlation and Comparison of Various Anthropometric Measurements of Body Fat Distribution and Sagittal Abdominal Diameter as a Screening Tool for Cardio Metabolic Risk Factors and ischaemic heart disease in elderly. J Assoc Physic India. 2015;63(1):22-6.

Pajunen P, Rissanen H, Laaksonen M, Heliovaara M, Reunanen A, Knekt P. Sagittal abdominal diameter as a new predictor for incident diabetes. Diab Care. 2012;36(2):283-8.

Turcato E, Bosello O, Di Francesco V, Harris T, Zoico E, Bissoli L et al. Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter as surrogates of body fat distribution in the elderly: their relation with cardiovascular risk factors. Int J Obesity. 2000; 24(8):1005-10.

Gallagher D, Visser M, Sepulveda D, Pierson RN, Harris T, Heymsfield SB. How useful is body mass index for comparison of body fatness across age, sex, and ethnic groups? Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143:228-39.

Wei M, Gaskill SP, Haffner SM, Stern MP. Waist circumference as the best predictor of noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) compared to body mass index, waist/hip ratio and other anthropometric measurements in Mexican Americans-a 7-year prospective study. Obes Res. 1997;5:16-23

Dobbelsteyn C, Joffres M, MacLean D, Flowerdew G. A comparative evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index as indicators of cardiovascular risk factors. The Canadian Heart Health Surveys. Int J Obesity. 2001;25(5):652-61.

Nahar N, Dubey S, Joshi A, Phadnis S, Sharma V. Association of anthropometric indices of obesity with diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia: a study from central India. Indian J Med Spec. 2012; 3(1):6-11.

De Souza N, De Oliveira E. Sagittal abdominal diameter shows better correlation with cardiovascular risk factors than waist circumference and BMI. J Diab Metab Disord. 2013;12(1):41.

Dahlén E, Bjarnegård N, Länne T, Nystrom F, Östgren C. Sagittal abdominal diameter is a more independent measure compared with waist circumference to predict arterial stiffness in subjects with type 2 diabetes - a prospective observational cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013;12(1):55.