Study of palmar patterns in diabetic patients

Authors

  • Sudagar M Department of Anatomy, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Maduranthagam, Kanchipuram-603308, Tamilnadu, India
  • Radha K Department of Anatomy, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Maduranthagam, Kanchipuram-603308, Tamilnadu, India
  • Duraipandian K Department of Anatomy, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Maduranthagam, Kanchipuram-603308, Tamilnadu, India
  • Sundaravadhanam KVK Department of Anatomy, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Maduranthagam, Kanchipuram-603308, Tamilnadu, India

Keywords:

Dermatoglyphics, a-b ridge count, atd angle, Axial triradii

Abstract

Background: Nowadays study of dermatoglyphics has a great importance in judicial and criminal researches. Similarly its study is related to some genetic diseases has an immense applications. Diabetes Mellitus is the silent killer of mankind and public health problem. Therefore investigators are looking for new methods for its early diagnosis and treatment. Dermatoglyphics is a growing discipline and its ease and ready applicability render it as a useful tool to the clinician. Dermatoglyphics may be effectively employed as a screening procedure in future and may help in the early detection of cases of diabetes mellitus.

Methods: The present study is undertaken with an aim to evaluate the dermatoglyphic features in diabetic patients. The study consists of 150 diabetic patients and 150 normal healthy individuals as controls. They were 75 males and 75 females in each group. Dermatoglyphic prints were taken by “Ink method” described by Cummins and Midlo and further subjected to statistical analysis to find the variations in the dermatoglyphic features among diabetic patients and control groups.

Results: Mean value of a-b ridge count is neither increased nor decreased in diabetic patients (P = 0.852). Mean value of atd angle is slightly decreased in diabetic patients (P = 0.2332). The frequency of t and t' are increased (P = 0.8462, P = 0.6681) and the frequency of t" is decreased (P = 0.757) in diabetic patients but they are not statistically significant.

Conclusion: From the present study, it appears that there do exists a variation in the dermatoglyphic patterns in diabetic patients with an advantage of being simple and economical ‘ink’ method. As the specific features of dermatoglyphic patterns are present in diabetic patients, it can be used for mass screening program to segregate the predicted diabetic patients.

References

Ana Tarca. Dermatoglyphics in diabetes mellitus of type 2 (T2DM) or non-insulin dependent. J Prev Med. 2006;14(1-2):60-70.

Barta L, Regoly-Merei A, Kammerer L. Dermatoglyphic features in diabetes mellitus. Acta Pediatr Acad Sci Hung. 1978;19(1):31-4.

Berg JM. The study of td dermal ridge count on the human palm. Hum Biol. 1968;40:375-85.

Bets LV, Dzhanibekova IV, LebedevNB, Kuraeva TL. Constitutional and dermatoglyphic characteristics of children with diabetes mellitus. Probl Endokrinol (Mosk). 1994;40(1):6-9.

Bhu N, Gupta SC. Study of palmer dermatoglyphics in diabetes mellitus. J Diabet Assoc India. 1981;21:99-107.

Cummins H. Dermataglyphics stigmata in Mongolism. Anat Record. 1936;64(Suppl 2):11.

Cummins H, Midlo C. Palmar and plantar epidermal configurations (dermatoglyphics) in European Americans. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1926;9:471-502.

Cummins H, Midlo C. Methods of printing: Ink method. In: Cummins H, Midlo C, eds. Finger Prints of Palms and Soles: an Introduction to Dermatoglyphics. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Blakiston Company; 1943: 45.

Dam PK, Vinod Joshi, Anil Purohit, Himmat Singh. Dermatoglyphic pattern in diabetes mellitus patients and non-diabetics. Annual Report 2009-2010. DMRC. 2006:66-76.

Hossein Rezaei Nezhad, Nasser Mahdavi Shah. Application of dermatoglyphics traits for diagnosis of diabetic type 1 patients. Int J Environ Sci Dev. 2010; 1(1): 36-39.

Julian L. Verbov. Dermatoglyphics in early onset diabetes mellitus. Hum Hered. 1973;23:535-42.

Li Yanhua, Wu Shoushan Han, Li Guo Qingmei, He Liping. Dermatoglyphics study of 210 patients with diabetes mellitus. Acta Anthropol Sinica. 1990;3:6.

Oladipo GS, MB Ogunnowo. Dermatoglyphic patterns in diabetes mellitus in South Eastern Nigerian population. Afr J Appl Zool Environ Biol. 2004;6:6-10.

Park K. Dermatoglyphics. In: Park K, eds. Park’s Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine. 21st ed. Jabalpur: Bhanot Publishers; 2007: 302-313.

Penros LS. Finger prints, palms and chromosomes. Ann Hum Genet. 1963;197;933-8.

Pramila Padmini M, Narasinga Rao B, Malleswari B. The study of dermatoglyphics in diabetics of north coastal Andhra Pradesh population. Indian J Fundamen Appl Life Sci. 201;1(2):75-80.

Schaumann BA, Alter M. Dermatoglyphic advantages. In: Schaumann BA, Alter M, eds. Dermatoglyphics in medical disorders. 1st ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1976: 187-189.

Shariatzadeh SMA, Madhavi Shahri N, Soleymani M. Quantitative and quantitative study of dermatoglyphics patterns in IDDM in Markazi Province. Iranian J Basic Med Sci. 2002;5(14):82-8.

Udoaka AL, Lawyer-Egbe K. Dermatoglyphic patterns of diabetic patients of Ijaw origin in port Hartcourt, Nigeria. Niger J Health Biomed Sci. 2009;8(2):72-82.

Vadgaonkar Rajanigandha, Pai Mangala, Prabu Latha Saralya Vasudha. Digito-Palmar complex in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Turk J Med Sci. 2006;36(6):353-5.

Vera M. Cabrera E, Guell R. Dermatoglyphics in insulin-dependent diabetic patients in Cuba. Acta Diabetolol. 1995;32(2):78-81.

Ziegler AG, Mathies R, Ziegelmayer G, Baumgartl HJ, Rodewald A, Chopra V, et al. Dermatoglyphics in type 1 DM. Diabet Med. 1993;10(8):720-4.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-11

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles